flash gunner wrote:
Here we go the old blame Kroenke for Wengers faults
He's only owned the club for a year or so while Wenger has been fucking us up for 6-7 years now. Red Member with his usual blame Kroenke smokescreen
Wenger is to blame. 90%.
However you do have to ask yourself why Kroenke would have come out a year ago, after Wenger had a shambolic season, and publicly gave his backing to a proven loser who had just completed six years without a trophy.
You would also have to ask why, as Wenger's boss, Kroenke has been willing to lay down the law to him when it comes to making extra cash from pre-season tours (Wenger was against it and got vetoed), of forcing Wenger to sell Nasri (Wenger wanted to keep him, vetoes by Kroenke)...but when it comes to investing in quality personnel and addressing the mediocrity of Wenger's mnagement, Kroenke is mysteriously silent? Isn't that strange?
Wenger is responsible for Arsenal's mediocrity, for their status as a selling club and their lack of success.
It was not Kroenke that failed to get one over on Alx McLeish in a cup final and not Kroenke who lost 8-2 at OT.
Wenger is lame and dinosaur. The game has passed him by, he became defunct the minute Chelski became the first London club t lift the CL.
However you can't overlook Kroenke's lack of pressure on Wenger. Wenger does what he wants because he has no success targets/objectives.
All those Arsenal fans who objected to Usmanov and backed our 'custodians', and then went on a march about it (well done Dead Action), and then claimed our financial model would reap dividens...well well how silly do they look nw?
The only ones getting dividends are the soon to be mega-loaded c*** who will sell on a healthy club with a mammoth cash reserve and who annually give themselves pay rises. Hilariou.