Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-me ... e-38933817
Pathetic.
Utterly pathetic.
And yet, so predictable.
Pathetic.
Utterly pathetic.
And yet, so predictable.
- Perryashburtongroves
- Posts: 13403
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:18 pm
- Location: At the start of a glorious era.
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Yep. They haven't had any attention for five minutes so they have to, yet again get some. Perhaps if they're that interested in bans, they could now reflect upon how their actions got English clubs banned from Europe for five years. Fucking move on.
- Bradywasking
- Posts: 6032
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Why is this happening now? As Perry just said it is the lack of publicity for five minutes that is driving them..Or maybe a way to deflect from recent performances.. It is sooo Liverpool
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
I can understand the reason.
However, Murdoch owns the Sun and the Times, as well as Sky (nearly). If he takes it personally would he ban Liverpool from Sky and The Time? No live match revenue or coverage. Be interesting to see how this pans out.
However, Murdoch owns the Sun and the Times, as well as Sky (nearly). If he takes it personally would he ban Liverpool from Sky and The Time? No live match revenue or coverage. Be interesting to see how this pans out.
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Spot onPerryashburtongroves wrote:Yep. They haven't had any attention for five minutes so they have to, yet again get some. Perhaps if they're that interested in bans, they could now reflect upon how their actions got English clubs banned from Europe for five years. Fucking move on.
Also responsible for all seater stadiums
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 58940
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Typical Victims FC. This type of shit cheapens the memory of 96 innocent people that were murdered by a combination of criminal negligence by the Police and the behaviour of their own so called fans.
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
The hysteria and modern day "JfT96" campaign are so far separated from the awful tragedy itself. this isn't about the victims, it is about everybody acknowledging how much the club and the city has been wronged.
It was absolutely clear to any impartial observer that rather than providing closure or whatever, any parliamentary or judicial intervention would just lead to even more frenzied demands for public prosecutions and other campaigns.
What happened that day was a disaster of unthinkable nature and proportions and I can't imagine what so many people must have been feeling afterwards. But this constant barrage of scattergun assaults from the club and the fans is just detracting from what this is all about - 96 people going to football and not coming back, not the world being against Liverpool FC.
It was absolutely clear to any impartial observer that rather than providing closure or whatever, any parliamentary or judicial intervention would just lead to even more frenzied demands for public prosecutions and other campaigns.
What happened that day was a disaster of unthinkable nature and proportions and I can't imagine what so many people must have been feeling afterwards. But this constant barrage of scattergun assaults from the club and the fans is just detracting from what this is all about - 96 people going to football and not coming back, not the world being against Liverpool FC.
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Sad c.unts - as if there's any relationship between the editorial team of 1989 and the journalists of today. Most of today's journos were in short trousers when it happened
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 42540
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
That's the thing with victims they need to be felt sorry for and pitied all the time - Without an excuse they can't blame the world for everything and why it is always someone else's fault ...Perryashburtongroves wrote:Yep. They haven't had any attention for five minutes so they have to, yet again get some. Perhaps if they're that interested in bans, they could now reflect upon how their actions got English clubs banned from Europe for five years. Fucking move on.
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 42540
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
SteveO 35 wrote:Sad c.unts - as if there's any relationship between the editorial team of 1989 and the journalists of today. Most of today's journos were in short trousers when it happened
Aaaaah! Yes, but they had Cockney accents.
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
I am in a viber group of lads that play 5 a side every Wednesday night, and I am absolutely pulling the piss out of those victims fc supporters over this I am getting dogs abuse varying from being told to "fcuk off" to "you'd better wear shin guards next Wednesday night"
- Rugby Gooner
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:25 pm
- Location: Rugby
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Were they asking questions about Heysel?
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:52 pm
- Location: London
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Yes heysel is also banned from turning up to press conferences.Rugby Gooner wrote:Were they asking questions about Heysel?
- Bradywasking
- Posts: 6032
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 am
Re: Liverpool FC ban for Sun journalists over Hillsborough
Any questions about Heysel have been redirected to Stamford Bridge..Rugby Gooner wrote:Were they asking questions about Heysel?