Bould

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
GranadaJoe
Posts: 2216
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Bould

Postby GranadaJoe » Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 41609
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Bould

Postby DB10GOONER » Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:35 pm

OneBard, augie - let's tone it down a bit huh? No need for personal insults.

For the record elpelsarmy has been a member here since 2006 - longer than either of you - and is not a WUM.

Also (in general) this habit on here of turning on anyone that differs from the agenda / party line of "hate Wenger no matter what" has got to stop. It's turning this forum into a one-dimensional brainwashed grouping as bad as anything we accuse the AKB of tbh.



For the record DB I never accused him of being a wum.

Secondly I dont give a fcuk if a guy is a member here 10 years or 10 weeks........if they are willing to debate things properly then that is ok with me regardless of whether they agree with me or not. I should not have resorted to calling him an arsehole and I accept that, but I 100% stand by my statement that he was being condescending and all bets are off at that stage for me.
Jesus... we are gonna play semantics huh? I didn't say you called him a WUM. I addressed both you and OneBard in one post rather than bother posting two basically the same posts. It was OneBard that called him a WUM.


No we are not gonna play semantics - what we are or at least should do, is judge things based on all factors and not just one word. For the record this is a debate about the usefullness about bould so there was no party line/agenda. In my world if people (including myself) act like an arsehole, then they/we are entitled to be called an arsehole - it is, for me at least, not a majorly offensive word, and again imo not worthy worthy of a rebuke,but at same time I'm okay with it
Yeah that's great but your world isn't this forum. We have rules on here about personal abuse/insults.

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Dark Side Of The Mood

Re: Bould

Postby OneBardGooner » Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything. :?

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Dark Side Of The Mood

Re: Bould

Postby OneBardGooner » Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:04 pm

OneBard, augie - let's tone it down a bit huh? No need for personal insults.

For the record elpelsarmy has been a member here since 2006 - longer than either of you - and is not a WUM.

Also (in general) this habit on here of turning on anyone that differs from the agenda / party line of "hate Wenger no matter what" has got to stop. It's turning this forum into a one-dimensional brainwashed grouping as bad as anything we accuse the AKB of tbh.



For the record DB I never accused him of being a wum.

Secondly I dont give a fcuk if a guy is a member here 10 years or 10 weeks........if they are willing to debate things properly then that is ok with me regardless of whether they agree with me or not. I should not have resorted to calling him an arsehole and I accept that, but I 100% stand by my statement that he was being condescending and all bets are off at that stage for me.
Jesus... we are gonna play semantics huh? I didn't say you called him a WUM. I addressed both you and OneBard in one post rather than bother posting two basically the same posts. It was OneBard that called him a WUM.


No we are not gonna play semantics - what we are or at least should do, is judge things based on all factors and not just one word. For the record this is a debate about the usefullness about bould so there was no party line/agenda. In my world if people (including myself) act like an arsehole, then they/we are entitled to be called an arsehole - it is, for me at least, not a majorly offensive word, and again imo not worthy worthy of a rebuke,but at same time I'm okay with it
Yeah that's great but your world isn't this forum. We have rules on here about personal abuse/insults.
OHHH!¬ FER FECKSSAAAKE! PEOPLE! PEOPLE! PEOPLE!!! Can't you see what's happening here Wenger & wiggy are driving us all apart...Yes! We have all become so weighed down with the anger, despair and utter powerlessness of our situation because of those two cun.ts we are now turning on one another.

So Peace Out okay!

btw: Augie stop blaming me ya shytebag! :lol: :wink: :wink:

User avatar
GranadaJoe
Posts: 2216
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Bould

Postby GranadaJoe » Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:13 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything. :?

Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Dark Side Of The Mood

Re: Bould

Postby OneBardGooner » Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:50 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything. :?

Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
The season isn't over yet! :wink:

User avatar
sk-gtfo
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 4:59 pm
Location: Not @ $Emirates$

Re: Bould

Postby sk-gtfo » Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:13 pm

What about Bould? - good defender from 20 odd years back? - not seen him since.. apart from that cardboard cutout of him that we have on the bench, I always wondered why that what there. :roll:

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Dark Side Of The Mood

Re: Bould

Postby OneBardGooner » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:45 am

Actually I am beginning to wonder about Wenger's reasons for having an Assistant Manager sat next to him in games, as they are not allowed to say/do anything - not even take notes; which is often one of the tasks an AM undertakes.

Perhaps because he (wenger) would look even more silly than he already does if there was an empty seat next to him. :rubchin:

robbo10
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:43 pm

Re: Bould

Postby robbo10 » Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:17 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything. :?

Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
But I've seen photos of him so he must be real?

User avatar
GranadaJoe
Posts: 2216
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Bould

Postby GranadaJoe » Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:29 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything. :?

Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
But I've seen photos of him so he must be real?
There were cameras 2000 years ago??!!??

User avatar
StuartL
Posts: 5254
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: Last chance saloon

Re: Bould

Postby StuartL » Wed Jan 17, 2018 6:56 pm

If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.

Ergo, nothing would change.

So what's the point of having a go at him?

Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything. :?

Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
But I've seen photos of him so he must be real?
There were cameras 2000 years ago??!!??
Alien technology :wink:

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 5463
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: SW France

Re: Bould

Postby TeeCee » Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:41 pm

Let’s call the Men in Black.......oh hang on, Wonga doesn’t like them does he!! :roll: 8)

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 24077
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Dark Side Of The Mood

Re: Bould

Postby OneBardGooner » Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:26 pm

Let’s call the Men in Black.......oh hang on, Wonga doesn’t like them does he!! :roll: 8)
:gettowork:

Blade
Posts: 751
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:44 am
Location: hong kong

Re: Bould

Postby Blade » Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:30 pm

BTW i have seen some AKBs refer to Bouldy as a brilliant defender.

Well the North Bank used to refer him as a "bald own goaler"!.

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 41609
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: Bould

Postby DB10GOONER » Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:32 pm

BTW i have seen some AKBs refer to Bouldy as a brilliant defender.

Well the North Bank used to refer him as a "bald own goaler"!.
What. The. Absolute. Fuck?

Sorry, I'm just gonna ask that again.... :rubchin:

What. The. Absolute. Fuck?

:lol:


Return to “On the Terraces”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests