And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
The naked celebrity links thread
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59215
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59215
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
begeegs wrote:Damnit - I didn't realize that there were other cliques here. Currently, I am only in the 'Bendtner was better than Giroud' clique which I am the only member. Hmmmm.....that's not really a clique, is it...
Anyone else want to join?
Herd, I think, will be in that one too. But he's gonna want to turn it into a firm and run about mob handed and splash claret all over the manor you nuttahs!!
- the playing mantis
- Posts: 3966
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
- Location: EX
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
uptons muff hasnt been revealed in any of those leaks...i had to do some research...apparently the stuff was off her bf's phone, and any gash on there isnt hers.clockender1 wrote:thats not true about kate uptons muff. its splendid. perfectly smooth, tidy and symmetrical. granted she's a big girl, but some of us can fill that gaprodders999 wrote: You know the way they say you should never meet your heroes yeah? Well after seeing those leaked photos of Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence (2 of my absolute faves) you should also never see the growler of a celebrity you want to shag. I've gone right off em
didn't Cat Deeley look rough as old dogs though ? and WHAT was Bar Rafaeli doing with that curling iron and her bottom....
kelly brook has an ugly axe wound. i'm just saying.....
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!
- SPUDMASHER
- Posts: 10739
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: London Euston
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Yes I saw that one. That could easily be described as a porn load!
-
- Posts: 16971
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Oh the banter
-
- Posts: 10289
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
mcdowell42 wrote:Oh the banter
Haven't laughed so much since my nan caught her left tit in the mangle
- rodders999
- Posts: 20167
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Diamond Club
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Time fo the month again?mcdowell42 wrote:Oh the banter
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59215
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Time of the fucking day in McD's case.rodders999 wrote:Time fo the month again?mcdowell42 wrote:Oh the banter
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger manDB10GOONER wrote:And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59215
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger.WE8SPURS wrote:Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger manDB10GOONER wrote:And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho
If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..."
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringerAnd whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
You make such an assumption that your ringer would be targetedWE8SPURS wrote: TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59215
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
begeegs wrote:You make such an assumption that your ringer would be targetedWE8SPURS wrote: TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer
-
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
one of her chest too.the playing mantis wrote:
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!
i have no idea what Rodders is on about - her boobs are glorious perfection imho almost as good as a Gerorge Graham Back 4.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59215
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact: