my post was a joke, obviously went over your head but even still I think you need to let it go mate.DB10GOONER wrote:I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger.WE8SPURS wrote:Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger manDB10GOONER wrote:And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho
If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..."
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
The naked celebrity links thread
- Henry Norris 1913
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 42540
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
This IS Spuddy we're on about here - So of course it would...well that and any other Orifice's...begeegs wrote:You make such an assumption that your ringer would be targetedWE8SPURS wrote: TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 42540
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Surely you know by now HN 1913 Everything goes over DB's head - for obvious reasons....Henry Norris 1913 wrote:my post was a joke, obviously went over your head but even still I think you need to let it go mate.DB10GOONER wrote:I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger.WE8SPURS wrote:Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger manDB10GOONER wrote:And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho
If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..."
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
- SPUDMASHER
- Posts: 10739
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: London Euston
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
No, I've got to be honest, my standards are pretty lowWE8SPURS wrote:TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringerAnd whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
I think the only thing I'd never fuck is DB10. Sloppy seconds is one thing but sloppy 9635428ths is another. He's starting to resemble an antique pin cushion he's had that many pricks
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
SPUDMASHER wrote:No, I've got to be honest, my standards are pretty lowWE8SPURS wrote:TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringerAnd whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
I think the only thing I'd never fuck is DB10. Sloppy seconds is one thing but sloppy 9635428ths is another. He's starting to resemble an antique pin cushion he's had that many pricks
- SPUDMASHER
- Posts: 10739
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: London Euston
- Contact:
The middle aged awnkers thread
Two pages backDB10GOONER wrote:Link?
- the playing mantis
- Posts: 3926
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
- Location: EX
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
mate, callin shenangans on this unless you can link it! also prove the gash too!clockender1 wrote:one of her chest too.the playing mantis wrote:
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!
i have no idea what Rodders is on about - her boobs are glorious perfection imho almost as good as a Gerorge Graham Back 4.
-
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
you are correct on the gash, i should have said that. one of the chest pics has batter trails on the left and right of the upper boob. you can see it.the playing mantis wrote:mate, callin shenangans on this unless you can link it! also prove the gash too!clockender1 wrote:one of her chest too.the playing mantis wrote:
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!
i have no idea what Rodders is on about - her boobs are glorious perfection imho almost as good as a Gerorge Graham Back 4.
the original pics i saw on Sunday were in an album which included about 20 pics. link is no more as it was a thread on 4chan linking to images on imgur. most of the pics are now i zip files on torrent sites like Pirate Bay
-
- Posts: 4992
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:35 pm
- Location: Taser the cuunt
Re: The middle aged awnkers thread
Not even QUARTZ can perform this stunt.
wtf happened here ????
WENGER OUT
wtf happened here ????
WENGER OUT
-
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm
Re: The middle aged awnkers thread
for the playing mantis :
[img]postimg.org/image/8ajzqp9o5/[/img]
[img]postimg.org/image/8ajzqp9o5/[/img]
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 58944
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Go on you lying little tease.SPUDMASHER wrote:No, I've got to be honest, my standards are pretty lowWE8SPURS wrote:TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringerAnd whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
I think the only thing I'd never fuck is DB10. Sloppy seconds is one thing but sloppy 9635428ths is another. He's starting to resemble an antique pin cushion he's had that many pricks
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 58944
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.
Yeah, unfortunately it is sometimes hard to assertain tone with the written word and sorry mate but you're not as witty as you think! That is why God gave us emoticons. If you are being sarcastic or attempting humour I'd suggest throwing one in there to demonstrate intent.Henry Norris 1913 wrote:my post was a joke, obviously went over your head but even still I think you need to let it go mate.DB10GOONER wrote:I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger.WE8SPURS wrote:Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger manDB10GOONER wrote:And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho
If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..."
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without.
Thusly if I write "go fuck yourself" and add that would mean I'm serious.
If I write "go fuck yourself" and add then it's banter (or "bantz" for TS and his grooming victim 1989).
Now can you please go fuck yourself.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 58944
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: The middle aged awnkers thread
I can only apologise. One of our junior mods seems to have gone Anti-Quartz and split the thread. I fully expect Quartz to re-merge it. And fuck it up too.Top Londoner wrote:Not even QUARTZ can perform this stunt.
wtf happened here ????
WENGER OUT
-
- Posts: 10211
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm
Re: The naked celebrity thread
The bloke who released nude photos of celebrities from the cloud this week is admitting he's on the run.
But apparently he's been given asylum by a shadowy group ...
known only as "Blokes".
But apparently he's been given asylum by a shadowy group ...
known only as "Blokes".