The naked celebrity links thread

It's all a load of Cannonballs in here! This is the virtual Arsenal pub where you can chat about anything except football. Be warned though, like any pub, the content may not always be suitable for everyone.
User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

DB10GOONER wrote:
WE8SPURS wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen... :roll:
Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger man :wink:

Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho :roll: :lol:
I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger. :wink:

If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..." :wink:

And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without. 8)
my post was a joke, obviously went over your head but even still I think you need to let it go mate. :|

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 42540
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by OneBardGooner »

begeegs wrote:
WE8SPURS wrote: TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer :rubchin: :oops: :lol:
You make such an assumption that your ringer would be targeted :lol:
This IS Spuddy we're on about here - So of course it would...well that and any other Orifice's... :shock: :D :wink:

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 42540
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by OneBardGooner »

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
WE8SPURS wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen... :roll:
Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger man :wink:

Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho :roll: :lol:
I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger. :wink:

If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..." :wink:

And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without. 8)
my post was a joke, obviously went over your head but even still I think you need to let it go mate. :|
Surely you know by now HN 1913 Everything goes over DB's head - for obvious reasons.... :D :wink:

User avatar
SPUDMASHER
Posts: 10739
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
Location: London Euston
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SPUDMASHER »

WE8SPURS wrote:
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without. 8)
TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer :rubchin: :oops: :lol:
No, I've got to be honest, my standards are pretty low :oops:
I think the only thing I'd never fuck is DB10. Sloppy seconds is one thing but sloppy 9635428ths is another. He's starting to resemble an antique pin cushion he's had that many pricks :wink:

WE8SPURS
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:25 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by WE8SPURS »

SPUDMASHER wrote:
WE8SPURS wrote:
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without. 8)
TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer :rubchin: :oops: :lol:
No, I've got to be honest, my standards are pretty low :oops:
I think the only thing I'd never fuck is DB10. Sloppy seconds is one thing but sloppy 9635428ths is another. He's starting to resemble an antique pin cushion he's had that many pricks :wink:
:wink: :lol:

User avatar
SPUDMASHER
Posts: 10739
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:07 am
Location: London Euston
Contact:

The middle aged awnkers thread

Post by SPUDMASHER »

DB10GOONER wrote:Link? :wink:
Two pages back

User avatar
the playing mantis
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: EX

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by the playing mantis »

clockender1 wrote:
the playing mantis wrote:
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!
one of her chest too. 8)

i have no idea what Rodders is on about - her boobs are glorious perfection imho almost as good as a Gerorge Graham Back 4.
mate, callin shenangans on this unless you can link it! also prove the gash too!

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by clockender1 »

the playing mantis wrote:
clockender1 wrote:
the playing mantis wrote:
there is apparently one of her back covered in baby batter though!
one of her chest too. 8)

i have no idea what Rodders is on about - her boobs are glorious perfection imho almost as good as a Gerorge Graham Back 4.
mate, callin shenangans on this unless you can link it! also prove the gash too!
you are correct on the gash, i should have said that. one of the chest pics has batter trails on the left and right of the upper boob. you can see it.

the original pics i saw on Sunday were in an album which included about 20 pics. :wink: link is no more as it was a thread on 4chan linking to images on imgur. most of the pics are now i zip files on torrent sites like Pirate Bay :mrgreen:

Top Londoner
Posts: 4992
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:35 pm
Location: Taser the cuunt

Re: The middle aged awnkers thread

Post by Top Londoner »

Not even QUARTZ can perform this stunt.
wtf happened here ????



WENGER OUT

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: The middle aged awnkers thread

Post by Chippy »

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

clockender1
Posts: 6257
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:53 pm

Re: The middle aged awnkers thread

Post by clockender1 »

for the playing mantis :

[img]postimg.org/image/8ajzqp9o5/[/img]

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 58944
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by DB10GOONER »

SPUDMASHER wrote:
WE8SPURS wrote:
And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without. 8)
TBH i don't think Wengers' love child potatoepeeler has forgiven me for my misguided post about his pops, best left to cool down for a while else I fear I may end up with a prolapsed ringer :rubchin: :oops: :lol:
No, I've got to be honest, my standards are pretty low :oops:
I think the only thing I'd never fuck is DB10. Sloppy seconds is one thing but sloppy 9635428ths is another. He's starting to resemble an antique pin cushion he's had that many pricks :wink:
Go on you lying little tease. :lol: :wink:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 58944
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by DB10GOONER »

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
WE8SPURS wrote:
DB10GOONER wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:And did you check with the mods to see if joking about paedophilia is ok? I hear there is a no tolerance attitude? Or are you a member of the infamous gay clique?
And then check if some of our dumber members can see the huge difference between comparing an innocent man to a convicted child molester in a childishly hateful way and light heartedly alluding to something that didn't happen... :roll:
Fuck me mate, I apologised. Don't you think it's about time you got over it, notice how I didn't throw my toys out of the pram when you indirectly called me a c@nt. it's called being the bigger man :wink:

Anyway if you check the original post you'll realise your mistake. I was comparing him to the lesser known jimmy seville not the jimmy saville you are obviously eluding to, personally I think it's a fucking disgrace that you would even dream of putting the two of them together but hey ho :roll: :lol:
I wasn't actually having a pop at you. I was having a pop at Henry Norris 1913 in reply to his pop at the mods for having a pop at your pop at Wenger. :wink:

If it was "indirect", how do you know I was refering to you as a cúnt? But then, as my old Gran always said, "if the cúnt shirt fits..." :wink:

And whilst I am flattered by your offer of sex, I will have to turn you down on this occasion. You might redirect your attentions towards Spuddy as he will fuck anything with a pulse and even the odd thing without. 8)
my post was a joke, obviously went over your head but even still I think you need to let it go mate. :|
Yeah, unfortunately it is sometimes hard to assertain tone with the written word and sorry mate but you're not as witty as you think! :wink: That is why God gave us emoticons. If you are being sarcastic or attempting humour I'd suggest throwing one in there to demonstrate intent.

Thusly if I write "go fuck yourself" and add :x that would mean I'm serious.

If I write "go fuck yourself" and add :wink: then it's banter (or "bantz" for TS and his grooming victim 1989).

Now can you please go fuck yourself.













:wink:

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 58944
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: The middle aged awnkers thread

Post by DB10GOONER »

Top Londoner wrote:Not even QUARTZ can perform this stunt.
wtf happened here ????



WENGER OUT
I can only apologise. One of our junior mods seems to have gone Anti-Quartz and split the thread. I fully expect Quartz to re-merge it. And fuck it up too. :wink:

LeftfootlegendGooner
Posts: 10211
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm

Re: The naked celebrity thread

Post by LeftfootlegendGooner »

The bloke who released nude photos of celebrities from the cloud this week is admitting he's on the run.

But apparently he's been given asylum by a shadowy group ...

known only as "Blokes".

Post Reply