1989 wrote:We could do far better than Walcott. That's the point.
hugh jardon wrote:1989 wrote:We could do far better than Walcott. That's the point.
Like who?
the moog wrote:hugh jardon wrote:1989 wrote:We could do far better than Walcott. That's the point.
Like who?
bale
ashley cole
valencia
the moog wrote:hugh jardon wrote:1989 wrote:We could do far better than Walcott. That's the point.
Like who?
bale
ashley cole
valencia
scott sinclair
nathan dyer
ben afar
hugh jardon wrote:Ben Arfa has showed glimpses of brilliance but again I would not see him as an improvement on Walcott.]
the moog wrote:valencia, ashley cole, scott sinclair, leon britton, wayne routlidge, park, TR7, the ox
hugh jardon wrote:
Leon Britton![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hugh jardon wrote:
TR7 doesn't play right-wing and The Ox, although has incredible potential is not yet on Theo's level.
QuartzGooner wrote:hugh jardon wrote:
Leon Britton![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
While we are at it we could also have Norman Lamont and Michael Heseltine.
Ok, it is not THAT Leon Britton but the point remains it is not as easy as it sounds to find a replacement for Walcott.
the moog wrote:my apologies i meant to post ashley young not ashley cole
hugh jardon wrote:the moog wrote:my apologies i meant to post ashley young not ashley cole
Whether Ashley Young is better than Walcott is open to debate. But would he leave United to join us? No. Would United even sell him to us? No.
So still no realistic replacement for Walcott offered by those who say he's not good enough.

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Lee1, markyp, mcdowell42, REB, Supagoon and 14 guests