As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.

Chelski bid for battersea

Postby LeftfootlegendGooner on Fri May 04, 2012 12:56 pm

Havent seen this mentioned so:

In the last hour according to ssn chelski have submitted a bid to buy battersea power station and surrounding area with plans for a sixty thousand seater stadium.

Will they fill this week in, week out, if they do will they end up the biggest club in London (obviously they don't have our history but could win the cl and have won recent competitions), and surely will meet with these new fair play rules in the coming years.
LeftfootlegendGooner
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm

Deliver A Parcel

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby Rocky Number Seven on Fri May 04, 2012 1:06 pm

I thought they had to get approval from the Chelsea Pitch Owners Association.

Also isnt Battersea Power Station a listed building? Could be totally wrong but thought I had read this somewhere before.
User avatar
Rocky Number Seven
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:23 am
Location: North Bank, Turnstile D, Block 7, Row 8, Seat 225 / Essex

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby LeftfootlegendGooner on Fri May 04, 2012 1:11 pm

Rocky Number Seven wrote:I thought they had to get approval from the Chelsea Pitch Owners Association.

Also isnt Battersea Power Station a listed building? Could be totally wrong but thought I had read this somewhere before.



Indeed it is listed but the area around it would be fine to build a stadium, that are planning a shopping centre etc so it is a large scale investment,
LeftfootlegendGooner
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:07 pm

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby QuartzGooner on Fri May 04, 2012 1:11 pm

Plus there is a Northern Line extension scheduled for Battersea too.

I think London is a large enough (and growing) city to have us and Chelsea and Spurs and West Ham as clubs with large stadiums.

But I think the smaller London clubs will remain small.
User avatar
QuartzGooner
 
Posts: 12380
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: Travelling

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby stg on Fri May 04, 2012 1:41 pm

All the sports media who are on twitter are reporting it. Perhaps Abramovich will do what Arsenal did at Highbury, make the ground flats and then the pitch owners can keep the pitch as a garden :mrgreen: or start sending his friends round to see if they can 'talk' to the pitch owners!!!!
stg
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby Perryashburtongroves on Fri May 04, 2012 1:42 pm

The listed status of the power station does seem to hinder this but who knows what favours one might receive if a certain Russian billionaire were to start throwing a few quid in the direction of Lambeth council. I remember reading somewhere that the Chavs would have to change their name if they ever managed to move from their National Front stronghold of Shitford Bridge. Something to do with the legal name belonging to another party.
User avatar
Perryashburtongroves
 
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: Luxembourg City

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby stg on Fri May 04, 2012 2:46 pm

Perryashburtongroves wrote:The listed status of the power station does seem to hinder this but who knows what favours one might receive if a certain Russian billionaire were to start throwing a few quid in the direction of Lambeth council. I remember reading somewhere that the Chavs would have to change their name if they ever managed to move from their National Front stronghold of Shitford Bridge. Something to do with the legal name belonging to another party.


The Chelsea Pitch Owners owns the name Chelsea Football Club Ltd, which is licensed back to the club on condition that the first team play their home matches at Stamford Bridge. This means that should Chelsea move to another stadium in the future, they would not be able to use the name Chelsea Football Club without permission from 75% of CPO shareholders
stg
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:16 am
Location: Broxbourne

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby StuartL on Fri May 04, 2012 5:28 pm

A mate took his son to watch Chelsea play Newcastle as a birthday treat :lol: :lol: :twisted:

He isn't a member of any sort but had no problems getting 2 tickets.

I serously doubt if they could fill a 60,000 seat stadium.
User avatar
StuartL
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: Mid table obscurity

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby donaldo on Fri May 04, 2012 5:43 pm

StuartL wrote:A mate took his son to watch Chelsea play Newcastle as a birthday treat :lol: :lol: :twisted:

He isn't a member of any sort but had no problems getting 2 tickets.

I serously doubt if they could fill a 60,000 seat stadium.


Very rarely do Arsenal fill the Concrete bowl.It would be great if the club annouced how many fans were actually in the stadium
User avatar
donaldo
 
Posts: 7783
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Wenger OUT

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby nexum5me on Fri May 04, 2012 6:57 pm

stg wrote:
Perryashburtongroves wrote:The listed status of the power station does seem to hinder this but who knows what favours one might receive if a certain Russian billionaire were to start throwing a few quid in the direction of Lambeth council. I remember reading somewhere that the Chavs would have to change their name if they ever managed to move from their National Front stronghold of Shitford Bridge. Something to do with the legal name belonging to another party.


The Chelsea Pitch Owners owns the name Chelsea Football Club Ltd, which is licensed back to the club on condition that the first team play their home matches at Stamford Bridge. This means that should Chelsea move to another stadium in the future, they would not be able to use the name Chelsea Football Club without permission from 75% of CPO shareholders


surely they'd just call themselves fc chelsea or (hopefully) something gay like chelsea united! then let the chelsea pitch owners enjoy owning a piece of grass in the middle of a load of flats
User avatar
nexum5me
 
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:25 pm
Location: chi

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby HashKads on Fri May 04, 2012 6:58 pm

I think it is the 4 towers that are listed and they'll incorporate those into the stadiums design.

It doesn't matter if they don't fill it, do you really think they'll build a stadium with the risk that it needs to be at maximum capacity week in week out? Of course not. I can't remember where I heard but club level and all the corporate boxes/seats at the Grove equate to the same amount of match day income we made at Highbury.

Also, the Northern line will be extended which means easier access as well as easier access for tourists to get to. The Battersea Power station site is massive, they're basically going to make a new high street, housing, offices etc.
User avatar
HashKads
 
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby SWLGooner on Sat May 05, 2012 8:02 am

Fuck having 60,000 chavs around every other Saturday.

When this story broke I spoke to a few mates who are involved in the CPO, all three dead against the move, and one of em's the chairperson.Hopefully it won't happen.
User avatar
SWLGooner
 
Posts: 10476
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Islington Town Hall, applauding the fourth place trophy.

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby OneBardGooner on Sat May 05, 2012 8:13 am

If it does go through, it will be a necessity to have the Pink Floyds big Pink bloated pigs at each corner of the ground
and a BNP flag to make jt feel at home! :wink:
User avatar
OneBardGooner
 
Posts: 10554
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Dark Side Of The Mood

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby highburyJD on Sat May 05, 2012 9:20 am

donaldo wrote:
StuartL wrote:A mate took his son to watch Chelsea play Newcastle as a birthday treat :lol: :lol: :twisted:

He isn't a member of any sort but had no problems getting 2 tickets.

I serously doubt if they could fill a 60,000 seat stadium.


Very rarely do Arsenal fill the Concrete bowl.It would be great if the club annouced how many fans were actually in the stadium

kind of a meaningless comment - we sell all the tickets
StuartL's mate would not have been able to buy two tickets for our game with Newcastle
(how important is that winner now btw!)

rarely is a cup final played at a 100k stadium without a spectator dying during proceedings
there are empty seats and empty seats
User avatar
highburyJD
 
Posts: 4355
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Re: Chelski bid for battersea

Postby olgitgooner on Sat May 05, 2012 2:01 pm

Image

The pigs have been fed, and are ready to fly. :D
User avatar
olgitgooner
 
Posts: 7112
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:39 am
Location: Sunny Sussex


Return to On the Terraces

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Barriecuda, Bing [Bot], bitterandstout, Google [Bot], swimmer1 and 11 guests