Top Londoner wrote:
rigsby wrote:How can anyone defend Robson, the mans a wanker who is West Ham through and through.
Rigsby. He was being subjective. It does not matter to me that he is a Hammer. Not the most eloquent bloke but he says it as it is imo.
See that is my opinion too - I absolutely agree that robson is a wanker but in this case he is hitting the nail on the head imo. Yesterday evening I listened to nutty on ssn more or less defending the club and state it was all about money and when merse came on I really expected a bit more honesty from him but instead got more of the same which shocked and disappointed me tbh
It comes to something when smudger was the more critical of the 3 of them and I am really fed up with ex players and pundits all hiding behind the greedy rvp line and not even mentioning the lack of ambition within the club - for me they dont even have to agree with me that it is the main reason but ffs at least acknowledge it as a very valid part of his reason in looking to leave. Robson, who in the past has defended wenger to the hilt (even last season
), was bang on the money here and even referred to his tactical and traning weaknesses and he said things that needed to be said instead of allowing the man to escape flak for everything wrong within the club as if the c**t walks on fcuking water