The Gooner Forum

Not sure if this has come up before.

Seems tattoos are it at the moment, players have increasingly complex ones, Bellerin and Giroud spring to mind. and what about Ceryls roses

BUT they don't look so relevant as they get older and aren't easy or cheap to remove.

Theres infection risk (Low but there) Misspelt tattoos and allergies

My oldest two had them done in Laos, just writing, not sure if the spellings right

You hear stories of DIY gimps buying machines online and having a go

Not sure about them myself

You've got 3 options to tick if you want

Personally, I have no tattoos whatsoever.

I like to stand out from the crowd

I also have a normal haircut. No piercings. And my mobile phone just goes ring ring.

They can look tripe, of that there is no doubt. I don’t regret mine, but they can certainly give over an impression of a gormless Ingerlund moron.

This from the perspective of someone with two full sleeves.

Plus the "Arsenal" on me stomach in olde English font.

each to his/her own, i have about 20 including 3 arsenal tattoos and regret none of them.

Some tats look good, others shit. I hate them on women tbh. Particularly women now in their 40s and 50s that were inked back in their teens or 20s. Sweet Lordy do them tats now look BAD. Also dislike tats on hands, necks or faces.

I have the olde 1970s Arsenal cannon on my right upper arm and it looks fantastic. One of the lads I go to The Arsenal with got a similar tat done in Turkey on hols and it looks proper shit. Really amateurish. I once debated getting a sleeve done but then it seemed every second fucker in Dublin got them done so I dropped the idea.

Currently debating getting the 1930s crest on my upper left arm.

your getting old now alan so maybe too much pain for you to get another tattoo

this is my latest one ,

REB wrote:your getting old now alan so maybe too much pain for you to get another tattoo

this is my latest one ,

I'm deffo getting old, John! But, no, don't mind the pain.

Have to say your VCC tat looks the dog's bollocks. Fantastic.

cheers, i went with my own idea rather then a normal one. 200e well spent

REB wrote:cheers, i went with my own idea rather then a normal one. 200e well spent

200 is a great price. One sitting?

i use the same guy for all my tattoos so he never over charges and he had it finished in just over an hour. my last tattoo took 6 hours and had 3 sitting , ouch

REB wrote: my last tattoo took 6 hours and had 3 sitting , ouch

Ah yes, the infamous one where you got a life-size depiction of my cock inked on your entire back.

What were you thinking of?

sadl;y no cock pic but did get a koi, artist put in on free hand and then 3 sittings and 6 hours later this

REB wrote:your getting old now alan so maybe too much pain for you to get another tattoo

this is my latest one ,

thats the biggest cock i've ever seen

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:

REB wrote:your getting old now alan so maybe too much pain for you to get another tattoo

this is my latest one ,

thats the biggest cock i've ever seen

You wanna see the one on his back!!

REB wrote:your getting old now alan so maybe too much pain for you to get another tattoo

this is my latest one ,

I like it a lot.
Shouldn't 4 be IV though?










WENGER OUT