As many of you will already know, I am a big critic of these groups and I fail to see what purpose they serve with the exception of maybe campaigning for some cosmetic changes at the grove. Personally it angers me that no group has ever came out strongly questioning the manager and seeking a change because I believe that there would be a noticeable change straight away in how things are run as soon as a new manager assumes control. However of late it has also begin to piss me off big time that no group seems to be willing to publicly lambast the absent owner - I can understand somewhat (but not agree at all) with the hesitation to publicly slate le cock after his exploits a decade ago, but kroenke has never done anything for the club and yet is, to all intensive purposes, getting a free pass for the farcical state our club is in
Do the members of these groups realise the significant fall from grace in which our club is in ? Do the members even try to put forth contravarsial viewpoints calling for action and if so do they feel that they feelings are being listened to ?As I said, my opinions on these groups is well documented, but I am on the outside looking in and I am wondering if there is more to these groups than meets the eye cos if there isnt, then they may as well disband imo
Ironic eh????
Awooooooogaaaah! 
