haye v bellew
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:12 pm
which one of these gobshites do you want to win then?
I got it on a stream so didnt pay there is no way id pay £17.99 to watch that but have to say it was a good fight.Allgunsblazin wrote:Boxing is shit nowadays, pumped up pussies in comparison to, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler and Thomas "Hitman" Hearns, compared to these clowns that you Pay Per View, yes the 80's were not all that bad...Respec!..
Didn't say you did, you as in whoever pays lol!flash gunner wrote:I got it on a stream so didnt pay there is no way id pay £17.99 to watch that but have to say it was a good fight.Allgunsblazin wrote:Boxing is shit nowadays, pumped up pussies in comparison to, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler and Thomas "Hitman" Hearns, compared to these clowns that you Pay Per View, yes the 80's were not all that bad...Respec!..
Comparing them to Duran, Hagler etc is a bit unfair you named 4 of the best boxers in Middleweight history maybe all time boxing history.
Always thought Duran was better at lightweight Flash. Hearns possibly at welter too but no argument that all four are modern, no, all-time greats.flash gunner wrote:I got it on a stream so didnt pay there is no way id pay £17.99 to watch that but have to say it was a good fight.Allgunsblazin wrote:Boxing is shit nowadays, pumped up pussies in comparison to, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler and Thomas "Hitman" Hearns, compared to these clowns that you Pay Per View, yes the 80's were not all that bad...Respec!..
Comparing them to Duran, Hagler etc is a bit unfair you named 4 of the best boxers in Middleweight history maybe all time boxing history.
Yeah i agree about the weights but when they were fighting each other it was at middleweight wasnt it? i still think the first round of Hagler Hearns was the best round of boxing ive ever seen!!! Its on youtube for anyone that hasnt seen itofficepest wrote:Always thought Duran was better at lightweight Flash. Hearns possibly at welter too but no argument that all four are modern, no, all-time greats.flash gunner wrote:I got it on a stream so didnt pay there is no way id pay £17.99 to watch that but have to say it was a good fight.Allgunsblazin wrote:Boxing is shit nowadays, pumped up pussies in comparison to, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler and Thomas "Hitman" Hearns, compared to these clowns that you Pay Per View, yes the 80's were not all that bad...Respec!..
Comparing them to Duran, Hagler etc is a bit unfair you named 4 of the best boxers in Middleweight history maybe all time boxing history.
Yes mate.flash gunner wrote:Yeah i agree about the weights but when they were fighting each other it was at middleweight wasnt it? i still think the first round of Hagler Hearns was the best round of boxing ive ever seen!!! Its on youtube for anyone that hasnt seen itofficepest wrote:Always thought Duran was better at lightweight Flash. Hearns possibly at welter too but no argument that all four are modern, no, all-time greats.flash gunner wrote:I got it on a stream so didnt pay there is no way id pay £17.99 to watch that but have to say it was a good fight.Allgunsblazin wrote:Boxing is shit nowadays, pumped up pussies in comparison to, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler and Thomas "Hitman" Hearns, compared to these clowns that you Pay Per View, yes the 80's were not all that bad...Respec!..
Comparing them to Duran, Hagler etc is a bit unfair you named 4 of the best boxers in Middleweight history maybe all time boxing history.