Bould/new backroom staff merged thread
- GranadaJoe
- Posts: 2412
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Bould
If Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59657
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Bould
Yeah that's great but your world isn't this forum. We have rules on here about personal abuse/insults.augie wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:57 pmDB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:05 pmJesus... we are gonna play semantics huh? I didn't say you called him a WUM. I addressed both you and OneBard in one post rather than bother posting two basically the same posts. It was OneBard that called him a WUM.augie wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:42 amDB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:07 amOneBard, augie - let's tone it down a bit huh? No need for personal insults.
For the record elpelsarmy has been a member here since 2006 - longer than either of you - and is not a WUM.
Also (in general) this habit on here of turning on anyone that differs from the agenda / party line of "hate Wenger no matter what" has got to stop. It's turning this forum into a one-dimensional brainwashed grouping as bad as anything we accuse the AKB of tbh.
For the record DB I never accused him of being a wum.
Secondly I dont give a fcuk if a guy is a member here 10 years or 10 weeks........if they are willing to debate things properly then that is ok with me regardless of whether they agree with me or not. I should not have resorted to calling him an arsehole and I accept that, but I 100% stand by my statement that he was being condescending and all bets are off at that stage for me.
No we are not gonna play semantics - what we are or at least should do, is judge things based on all factors and not just one word. For the record this is a debate about the usefullness about bould so there was no party line/agenda. In my world if people (including myself) act like an arsehole, then they/we are entitled to be called an arsehole - it is, for me at least, not a majorly offensive word, and again imo not worthy worthy of a rebuke,but at same time I'm okay with it
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 43357
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Bould
That's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything.GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pmIf Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 43357
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Bould
OHHH!¬ FER FECKSSAAAKE! PEOPLE! PEOPLE! PEOPLE!!! Can't you see what's happening here Wenger & wiggy are driving us all apart...Yes! We have all become so weighed down with the anger, despair and utter powerlessness of our situation because of those two cun.ts we are now turning on one another.DB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:35 pmYeah that's great but your world isn't this forum. We have rules on here about personal abuse/insults.augie wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:57 pmDB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:05 pmJesus... we are gonna play semantics huh? I didn't say you called him a WUM. I addressed both you and OneBard in one post rather than bother posting two basically the same posts. It was OneBard that called him a WUM.augie wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:42 amDB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:07 amOneBard, augie - let's tone it down a bit huh? No need for personal insults.
For the record elpelsarmy has been a member here since 2006 - longer than either of you - and is not a WUM.
Also (in general) this habit on here of turning on anyone that differs from the agenda / party line of "hate Wenger no matter what" has got to stop. It's turning this forum into a one-dimensional brainwashed grouping as bad as anything we accuse the AKB of tbh.
For the record DB I never accused him of being a wum.
Secondly I dont give a fcuk if a guy is a member here 10 years or 10 weeks........if they are willing to debate things properly then that is ok with me regardless of whether they agree with me or not. I should not have resorted to calling him an arsehole and I accept that, but I 100% stand by my statement that he was being condescending and all bets are off at that stage for me.
No we are not gonna play semantics - what we are or at least should do, is judge things based on all factors and not just one word. For the record this is a debate about the usefullness about bould so there was no party line/agenda. In my world if people (including myself) act like an arsehole, then they/we are entitled to be called an arsehole - it is, for me at least, not a majorly offensive word, and again imo not worthy worthy of a rebuke,but at same time I'm okay with it
So Peace Out okay!
btw: Augie stop blaming me ya shytebag!
- GranadaJoe
- Posts: 2412
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Bould
OneBardGooner wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pmThat's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything.GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pmIf Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 43357
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Bould
The season isn't over yet!GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:13 pmOneBardGooner wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pmThat's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything.GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pmIf Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 43357
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: Bould
Actually I am beginning to wonder about Wenger's reasons for having an Assistant Manager sat next to him in games, as they are not allowed to say/do anything - not even take notes; which is often one of the tasks an AM undertakes.
Perhaps because he (wenger) would look even more silly than he already does if there was an empty seat next to him.
Perhaps because he (wenger) would look even more silly than he already does if there was an empty seat next to him.
Re: Bould
But I've seen photos of him so he must be real?GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:13 pmOneBardGooner wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pmThat's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything.GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pmIf Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
- GranadaJoe
- Posts: 2412
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: Bould
There were cameras 2000 years ago??!!??robbo10 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:17 pmBut I've seen photos of him so he must be real?GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:13 pmOneBardGooner wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pmThat's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything.GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pmIf Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
- StuartL
- Posts: 7878
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
- Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good
Re: Bould
Alien technologyGranadaJoe wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:29 pmThere were cameras 2000 years ago??!!??robbo10 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 2:17 pmBut I've seen photos of him so he must be real?GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:13 pmOneBardGooner wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pmThat's easy for you to say, but I've tried asking baby jesus zillions of times and he wont answer me or do anything.GranadaJoe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:09 pmIf Bould stood up to AW he would be sacked and replaced with somebody who would adhere to their job description and do what AW wants them to do.
If he chose to leave the same thing would happen.
Ergo, nothing would change.
So what's the point of having a go at him?
Get rid of Kroenke or Wenger and something might change.
Conclusive proof that baby jesus doesn't exist, me thinks.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59657
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact: