typical AKB response,id say signing of the century,who needs Ronaldo when you have Elneny,Arsene knows best blah blah blah,total bollox,bang average id ay for his debut and id be amazed if he offers anything other than cover in the long termLaughingGooner wrote:Thought it was a decent debut.
Looked neat and tidy and tactically, he did very well.
Hope he's retained for Tuesday, but I fear Flamini will be back in the side.
Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:35 am
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
Fair points, we should only judge a player on his debut and then slaughter him if he doesn't match Zidane at his best.markyp wrote:typical AKB response,id say signing of the century,who needs Ronaldo when you have Elneny,Arsene knows best blah blah blah,total bollox,bang average id ay for his debut and id be amazed if he offers anything other than cover in the long termLaughingGooner wrote:Thought it was a decent debut.
Looked neat and tidy and tactically, he did very well.
Hope he's retained for Tuesday, but I fear Flamini will be back in the side.
Get rid of him, he's clearly not got what it takes.
Keep on with the unique tactical insights fella, your posts offer great reading
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
your stupid WUM posts grate nearly every bloke here you Wenker butt hole lickerLaughingGooner wrote:Fair points, we should only judge a player on his debut and then slaughter him if he doesn't match Zidane at his best.markyp wrote:typical AKB response,id say signing of the century,who needs Ronaldo when you have Elneny,Arsene knows best blah blah blah,total bollox,bang average id ay for his debut and id be amazed if he offers anything other than cover in the long termLaughingGooner wrote:Thought it was a decent debut.
Looked neat and tidy and tactically, he did very well.
Hope he's retained for Tuesday, but I fear Flamini will be back in the side.
Get rid of him, he's clearly not got what it takes.
Keep on with the unique tactical insights fella, your posts offer great reading
-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:35 am
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
I merely stated that Elneny had a decent debut.
Enlighten me as to how this was a wind up post???
You then turned my post into having yet another dig at Wenger. I didn't mention Wenger in my post at all.
But nevermind, you wanted to brown nose all the other Wenger haters here and you probably succeeded.
I guess all my posts will be labelled just an attempt to wind up everyone here.
Funny thing is I've been critical of Wenger in the past but my generally positive posts here are way out of line.
We must bitch, moan and abuse our manager and players at every opportunity.
But I guess that is the way with the modern football fan.
Enlighten me as to how this was a wind up post???
You then turned my post into having yet another dig at Wenger. I didn't mention Wenger in my post at all.
But nevermind, you wanted to brown nose all the other Wenger haters here and you probably succeeded.
I guess all my posts will be labelled just an attempt to wind up everyone here.
Funny thing is I've been critical of Wenger in the past but my generally positive posts here are way out of line.
We must bitch, moan and abuse our manager and players at every opportunity.
But I guess that is the way with the modern football fan.
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
No you are a WUM because every post of yours is sarcastic, childish and purely designed to wind people up. You didn't merely state anything, it was the typical childish sarcastic style.
- StuartL
- Posts: 7878
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
- Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
To be fair Northbank all my posts are sarcastic and childish too.northbank123 wrote:No you are a WUM because every post of yours is sarcastic, childish and purely designed to wind people up. You didn't merely state anything, it was the typical childish sarcastic style.
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
Yes but you are anti-Wenger so it doesn't matter.StuartL wrote:To be fair Northbank all my posts are sarcastic and childish too.northbank123 wrote:No you are a WUM because every post of yours is sarcastic, childish and purely designed to wind people up. You didn't merely state anything, it was the typical childish sarcastic style.
-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:35 am
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
I'll ask again......how is stating that Elneny had a decent debut an attempt at winding everyone up!?!?!?northbank123 wrote:No you are a WUM because every post of yours is sarcastic, childish and purely designed to wind people up. You didn't merely state anything, it was the typical childish sarcastic style.
Just because I've posted pro Wenger comments I get labelled a WUM.
It's funny
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
What is everyone obsession with Wanyama? He is trending on an Aaron Ramsey thead, the game against Southampton thread, and in this thread. The suggestions are Wanyama is better than Ramsey, we cant beat Southampton because of Wanyama, and Wenger should have spent 30m on Wanyama rather than buy Elneny.
Does Wanyama sh.. gold?
Anyone remember when we signed Kosicleny and the masses wailed because we 'needed someone like Shawcross'
Does Wanyama sh.. gold?
Anyone remember when we signed Kosicleny and the masses wailed because we 'needed someone like Shawcross'
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
its because you seem to have been watching a different game,jizzing over is performance was taking it a massive stretch too far,he did a job and didn't fuck anything up is all you can say in reality not what you wrote,its was hardly up their with Vieras debut was it or are you too young to remember that?LaughingGooner wrote:I'll ask again......how is stating that Elneny had a decent debut an attempt at winding everyone up!?!?!?northbank123 wrote:No you are a WUM because every post of yours is sarcastic, childish and purely designed to wind people up. You didn't merely state anything, it was the typical childish sarcastic style.
Just because I've posted pro Wenger comments I get labelled a WUM.
It's funny
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
Sorry just checked this post again and it is indeed a simple statement of opinion and not a childish antagonistic steaming pile of turdLaughingGooner wrote:Fair points, we should only judge a player on his debut and then slaughter him if he doesn't match Zidane at his best.markyp wrote:typical AKB response,id say signing of the century,who needs Ronaldo when you have Elneny,Arsene knows best blah blah blah,total bollox,bang average id ay for his debut and id be amazed if he offers anything other than cover in the long termLaughingGooner wrote:Thought it was a decent debut.
Looked neat and tidy and tactically, he did very well.
Hope he's retained for Tuesday, but I fear Flamini will be back in the side.
Get rid of him, he's clearly not got what it takes.
Keep on with the unique tactical insights fella, your posts offer great reading
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
Such childish comments - maybe a comment on Wanyama's ability might prove of more value on a forum??Wilson wrote:What is everyone obsession with Wanyama? He is trending on an Aaron Ramsey thead, the game against Southampton thread, and in this thread. The suggestions are Wanyama is better than Ramsey, we cant beat Southampton because of Wanyama, and Wenger should have spent 30m on Wanyama rather than buy Elneny.
Does Wanyama sh.. gold?
Anyone remember when we signed Kosicleny and the masses wailed because we 'needed someone like Shawcross'
And Koscielny sadly is hardly the benchmark of success. after a few shocking seasons he has turned into a decent and now a good defender but one who makes far too many lapses of concentration that cost us. He has been piss-poor on that front in the last 6 weeks.
And I honestly can't remember Shawcross' name being bandied about
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
Wilson wrote:What is everyone obsession with Wanyama? He is trending on an Aaron Ramsey thead, the game against Southampton thread, and in this thread. The suggestions are Wanyama is better than Ramsey, we cant beat Southampton because of Wanyama, and Wenger should have spent 30m on Wanyama rather than buy Elneny.
Does Wanyama sh.. gold?
Anyone remember when we signed Kosicleny and the masses wailed because we 'needed someone like Shawcross'
Shawcross was NEVER suggested as a coveted player on here - apart from the fact that he isnt even related to a footballer, the fact that he broke ramsey's leg would exclude any possibility of signing him. On yeah and he is also a c.unt as well
Wanyama pisses all over every single midfielder we have and I include ramsey in that. He pisses over them because he is physically strong, positionally disciplined and good in the tackle - basically he is the type of midfielder that we NEED, but instead we sign a £5m camel farmer that is shocked at the physicality of the english league
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
I'm more than happy to give Elneny a chance and agree that we shouldn't be writing him off after 1 game. My old man, the uber AKB, did warn that he looks a bit soft for the PL just yet, so if the lad is going to make it, then its more than likely going to be a slow burner. To be honest he's the sort of player that a few years ago we would probably be more accepting of......a bit like Edu who wasn't a regular most of the time because he was third or fourth in line behind the likes of PV4, Fabregas and Gilberto. The issue now of course is that we are lacking a natural player who sits deep and has a physical presence so we always hope that we'll sign someone to fill that void.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 59656
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Welcome: Mohamed Elneny
falkirk goon wrote:So in summing up DB is le bumhole (a) a bumhole (b) a furburger or (c) a hippos yawnDB10GOONER wrote:Watched the whole game on Setanta. He's not a natural DM. He looks more a box to box player so comparing him to Captain Stupid Flamoney is a tad unfair. He looked tidy enough in passing and moving and isn't afraid to shoot. A good addition to the squad if we had signed him last summer if we had unloaded the Ox. But as the only January signing? Why?
So we have another attacking midfielder (that's 532 now, I believe!) but haven't signed the DM, CH and striker we need. Top work Arsene, top work.
(b) a furburger.