Success as a top flight football club - where do Arsenal stand realistically?

In the wake of a slide down football’s rich list, a state of the nation report on the club

Success as a top flight football club - where do Arsenal stand realistically?

Raul - Recruitment and talent spotting skills questionable

The way the game is played and clubs are managed at the top level has clearly changed in the past five years.

All-powerful managers like Arsene and Sir Alex have gone, replaced with inter-linking silo structures run by powerful CEO’s or Director’s of Football.

Academies are distinct but vitally integrated parts of the business expected to generate both first team players and regular profits from player sales.

Directors of football oversee recruiting and selling established and developing talent to fit the team’s desired profile and specific needs given its chosen playing style.

Scouting networks, agents and analytics are used to varying degrees to try and find nuggets and avoid dogs in a globally competitive marketplace.

Coaches like players are changed to better implement the playing strategy and are worked hard like the players and changed as ruthlessly.

The result, theoretically, is a more sustainable business model - one not exposed to prolonged upheaval when the king is changed and performance tanks financially as well as footballistically.

Chelsea were trend setters in this approach, City followed and now others have followed suit in response to the increased competition at the top of the league and the huge financial costs of missing out on the top 4 (now well over £60m pa in pure profit - or two Aubameyangs a season). (Ed’s note – this is worked out combining the cost of Aubameyang’s transfer fee and wages – approx. £90m - over a three year period).

Of course, whilst the competition between the top 6 has got more intense that has not stopped new entrants threatening the top 6’s exclusive access to European football (the Europa League is worth another Aubameyang a season to the participants or £30m pa in pure profit). Leicester (twice) and Wolves have all breached the fortress and Everton are pressing hard thanks to huge financial investment and soft sponsorships from Arsenal’s ex minority shareholders.

What is clear is that finance alone does not guarantee continued financial success.

Arsenal enjoyed spending 50% more on wages than Liverpool and up to 100% more than Spurs and still those two clubs overtook the team on the pitch and now in the money league. Both used transformational player sales, soundly re-invested to step up on the pitch (selling Suarez then Coutinho in Liverpool’s case and Modric and Bale in Spurs’) coupled with going for the right modern playing style coach and good academy development to not only overtake Arsenal on the pitch but fund new stadiums at the same time through their owners deep pockets - thus matching Arsenal’s one source of competitive advantage. Leicester are trying to follow suit with considerable success so far (using the sales of Mahrez and Maguire plus not frittering their one Champions League payday) and hiring a re-inspired Rodgers from Celtic.

Meanwhile, United and Arsenal have tried unsuccessfully to spend their way back to the top 4 with failed coaching changes and failed player purchases piling up in their wake. United’s huge legacy commercial contract advantage from SAF’s days and occasional Champions League appearances have so far helped protect them more than Arsenal - who lacked sufficient reserves and slack in their annual budget to weather three years of continued failure and now stand on the somewhat of a precipice.

So what is needed for success now?

A modern playing style, a coach to implement it, a good academy and good talent spotting to make sure you buy the right established players certainly helps. So too does owners who invest in the infrastructure (Liverpool and Spurs) or support the team through soft sponsorship (City and Everton) or openly fund losses (Abramovich pumped £250m back in to Chelsea in 2018 and was rewarded with a return to the Champions League). In all cases, owners and business managers who are savvy enough to make fast management changes at all levels as needed is a must.

So where do Arsenal stand?

Financially they are a long way short of accessible on-pitch rivals like Spurs ad Chelsea (in 2021 the gap in revenue could be E100m pa which translates straight to the playing squad).

Their academy appears as integrated as many but lacks the resources some have to throw at global young talent.

Their coaching set up and playing style thankfully looks more closely aligned now under Arteta than it has for almost 20 years.

Their recruitment and spotting skills however remain questionable under King Raul. Whatever happened to world leading data analytics? Has it been shelved and replaced with Joorabchian’s chicken bones and a few highly speculative risk signings (like Pepe)?

And what of their owner? Still absent, still slow to react to on-pitch malaise and definitely not inclined to put his hand in his pocket to help weather the storm or refinance those £250m of legacy debts which still drain the club to the tune £20m pa of cash.

What can we expect?

Continued struggle, even if by some miracle we get back in the top 4 that won’t change. The other clubs are going nowhere and it’ll be a fight to be top 6 every season. Maybe that’s enough to put Stan off and persuade him to sell up, that and the continued blocking of super league proposals and insistence by the Premier League in a fairly shared revenue model that removes the natural upside from just staying invested. But don’t hold your breath. It may take further decline next season to push him over the edge….


The campaign to save The Gooner for the 2020/21 season has now been launched. If you wish to see the fanzine continue printing after the end of the current season, details of how to subscribe can be found here. We need to secure 1,000 subscribers by the end of March 29th to continue. 

The current issue of The Gooner (281), including a free 2020 'History of the Arsenal Crest' calendar is on sale now. You can order your copy here (for UK orders) or if you are abroad, order here.


You can follow The Gooner on
or subscribe to our
YouTube channel (where you can find the GoonerFanzineTV weekly podcast)

The January edition of the monthly (original) Gooner podcast can be listened to and downloaded here

Save The Gooner Subscribe to the printed version to help keep us in print for the 2020-21 season Save The Gooner

NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.

Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.


  1. Moscowgooner

    Jan 19, 2020, 8:04 #116247

    MA certainly needs to be given a decent chance to turn things around. Three seasons? The problem with Emery was that there seemed to be no coherent plan in place or long term objectives. Since the bulk of supporters stuck with AW for years past his sell by date, I think MA can survive a year or two of mid table finishes, particularly if we can win a cup. By the same token Kroenke needs to go but we know that’s not going to happen any time soon - unless someone (from the Middle East?) makes him an offer he can’t refuse. However the fundamentals at Arsenal remain strong: we have a global support base and recognition that the likes of Everton, Wolves and Leicester can’t match. We have the history. We have the stadium. We have the season ticket revenue base. This advantage will take years to erode/corrode. We won nothing between 1953 and 1970, but we still had the support and status to be generally regarded as a big club. Not an argument for complacency but an argument for objectivity about our long term position in English football.

  2. markymark

    Jan 18, 2020, 10:07 #116238

    Bard the problem is if Arsenal go mid table MA will be toast. A large section of the fan base will start moaning and there will then be a big debate on bringing in an interim experienced manager . We will simply replay Man UTD albeit in 12th place. The attempts to remove Kroenke would have to start during a period of relative success ( however we measure it ) so that the owners and the success of the club are separated. I keep banging on about this but the owners are shielded by at least 3 manager failures before it starts building on them . Next issue is what Kroenke? Stan has handed it to Josh . Keep on going on about Stan and all it does is successfully deflect from Josh. Josh in turn may well get sympathy as “hey he does his best and he tries to do the best thing” and all these entitled Arsenal supporters moan” It’s a campaign that needs real strategy and then one can hope Dangote finishes his cement works or Oil refineries etc

  3. Bard

    Jan 18, 2020, 8:04 #116237

    Really good article. Arsenal are in big trouble. If MA tanks then it's a certain slide into the lower half of the table. From there it's impossible to mount a challenge as you cant buy decent players. Player recruitment has been poor for years, nothing has changed to alter that. What is really needed is mutiny in the stands against the owner. If we can get rid of Stan we might be able to turn the club around. My gut feeling is it's closer than we think because at last we look like we have a decent coachm